Scarface

 (1932)


  • User Rating 17 votes
  • Critics Rating 2 critics
  • Your Rating   

User Reviews

bla
Aug 18, 2007
grisafi2003 - yahoo.com
bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla... Full review
you can thank this movie for 1983's scarface
Aug 18, 2007
venomjrl312 - yahoo.com
I saw the Scarface(1983) first, then i had the chance to see this version , and while it does not match as far all out violence and crazy bloodfests, it is worth watching, sure it is black and white, but the... Full review
"Do It First, Do It Yourself, And Keep On Doing It"
Jan 20, 2007
bkoganbing - imdb.com
Unlike James Cagney and Edward G. Robinson in their career making roles as gangsters, Paul Muni after Scarface was able to avoid being typecast for his career. Only rarely did Muni return to a gangster part in his career.It must... Full review
lameeeeeee
Jul 08, 2006
gurvingill - yahoo.com
never watch this movie it is relly boring I would watch the 1983 verison with al pichino. And bad acting it was hell of lame I fell a sleep in the middle of the story... Full review
Ahead Of Its Time, Action-Wise
Mar 11, 2006
ccthemovieman-1 - imdb.com
Action-wise, this movie was 60 years ahead of its time, at least in terms of the amount of action in it. I think it's safe to say most classic films, including the crime movies, are much slower in pace than... Full review
Scarface 1
Oct 21, 2005
jr10172000 - yahoo.com
Scarface was one of the finest gangster movies of the early Century, the newer edition (Scarface w/ Picino) was better, but that was because of the visuals. This was surely one of Paul Muni's best performaces.... Full review
Easily one of the best gangster films ever
Jul 09, 2005
Wayne Malin - imdb.com
Film chronicles the rise and fall of Tony Camonte (Paul Muni) an ugly, stupid and violent gangster.This film was originally shot in 1930 but was held from release until 1932 because the censor demanded cuts. Watching it, I can only... Full review
Great
May 26, 2005
bdough97 - yahoo.com
This movie may well be the first true gangster movie with a real taste for power and violance. If you aint seen it you need to. I was fortunate enough to get it in the 25th anniversery edition scarface box. It... Full review
"Scarface" is the film of the Thirties which is most often brought up in discussions on the gangster movie… According to Hawks, he directed "Scarface" with the idea of telling the story of the Capone family as if they were... Full review
Great movie
May 01, 2005
quack_quack6535 - yahoo.com
I just saw "Scarface" on TCM and I must say, it's one of the best movies I've ever seen. The visuals weren't anything special, but that's because it was 1932. Come on! Other than that, the story, the acting...everything about it... Full review

Critics Reviews


mtv.com
The grimness of Scarface is leavened by a few choice moments of black humor. After its first run, Scarface was completely withdrawn from distribution on Hughes' orders; the film would not be seen again on a widespread basis until it was reissued by Universal in 1979, shorn of 8 of its original 99 minutes. ... Full Review

Combustible Celluloid
Scarface is unquestionably one of the greatest talking American movies ever made Hawks was never a show-off director, but Scarface is full of delicious imagery, like the "X" symbol that shows up whenever anyone is dead or as good as dead. ... Full Review

News

No news articles

Post Comment

Name (appears on your post)
Your Comment
1000 characters left. No HTML please.
 
Type the characters in the image above