Nightstalker

This movie makes Paul W. S. Anderson and Uwe Boll look talented, and their flicks appear enjoyable. Unbelievably, Fisher's "Nighstalker" manages to be, simultaneously, campy and filthy, annoying and dull, unnerving and boring, ridiculous and repulsive. There is really nothing... Full review

I have to agree with the other reviewers. There are several things wrong with this film: The real night stalker killed people of all races, not just hispanics. The focus of the story was not on the killer Ramirez, it... Full review

This film is absolutely a true pain to watch. Literally!The other comments have covered all the problems with this movie already, so I will just agree with them. But, it is the painful camera work and editing that truly made... Full review

About the only thing in common with the actual Nightstalker that this film has is the name. It's a totally false portrayal of the events that took place in the mid 80s in Los Angeles and San Francisco.First off, let... Full review

The best aspect of Nightstalker, however, is the editing. In fact these sequences seem to make the rest of the film look bad Anyone interesting in editing, however, should definitely see this film. ... Full Review

Nightstalker is currently enjoying a run on the festival circuit before its video release (by Columbia TriStar). Chris Fishers debut feature Nightstalker is a very worthy addition to the recent low-budget sub-genre of true-life serial killer films. ... Full Review

Once again, the effects used here are better than good, especially considering the small budget they probably had to deal with in the making of Nightstalker . Someone to watch over me A Review by Dainon Moody 01/21/2003 The most visually stunning moments of Nightstalker happen when the killer in question is on the screen. ... Full Review